Posts Tagged ‘J&K’
Cellphones, Cricket, Apples….Security Concerns Rule Everything in J&K
India has gained mastery over chaotic diplomacy in the domestic and international arenas. The latest demonstration of this mastery came just days after P.M. Singh visited Jammu and Kashmir to win the hearts and minds of the people in the State. P.M. Singh inaugurated a train service linking Kashmir with Srinagar and UPA chairperson Sonia Gandhi addressed a public rally without bullet-proof screens. The gestures were aimed at highlighting the return of normalcy to the terror ridden J&K. Even before the people of the State could react to the new initiatives, the Home Ministry announced the decision to ban pre-paid cellular phones in J&K. The reasons are obvious: security concerns, terrorists could misuse these connections. The ban applies only to pre-paid connections because the validation process for securing such a connection is much easier than the post-paid ones. Now 39 lakh people with pre-paid cellular connections will have to look for alternative means of connecting across the state. Moreover, by the classic stroke of a pen, 10,000 telephone operators most of whom are young Kashmiri youth will loose their jobs. Connectivity and economic development were the dominant themes of P.M. Singh’s recent visit to J&K. Could there be a better way to further alienate the people of J&K? Click to continue…
The Son of a Militant is Not Necessarily a Militant
After reading and writing gloomy analysis on the human rights situation in Jammu and Kashmir and the official apathy towards it, I came across something different this morning. For a change the Government of Jammu and Kashmir has acted sensibly and C.M. Omar Abdullah has adopted a progressive stand. No, this is not about AFSPA. It’s about a common Kashmiri, Basharat Bashir Baba’s dream. The only difference is that Bashir Baba’s father was involved in militant activities. Omar Abdullah’s gesture has prevented one more Kashmiri youth from joining the gang of militants.
In a report carried by The Statesman, Bashir Baba’s ordeal and this rare respite was narrated. The teenaged footballer was one of three selected from a group of 300 for professional exposure and training in Spain and Brazil (where the game is played at a very high level) under a programme run by an Argentine coach, Juan Marcos Troia. He had waited for over a year for a passport to be issued to him, even moved the High Court against his being denied travel documents because his father had been involved in militant activity, but no redress came his way. But when Omar’s attention was drawn to a media report on Basharat’s being blocked, he dribbled with the craft of a Ronaldo and hit the net with the power of a Rooney. Taking the bold line that a son could not be made to suffer for what his father had done, he directed the red-tape be cut and the passport delivered pronto.
Though Bashir Baba is on his way to pursue his dreams the common practice of denying passports to relatives of suspects and militants in J&K needs to be re-considered. The Government can’t remain can active stimulus in swelling the militant ranks through supporting practices.
Gilgit-Baltistan Empowerment Ordinance: A Change in Nomenclature Only
The Gilgit-Baltistan Empowerment and Self-Governance Ordinance 2009 was approved by Pakistan’s Federal Cabinet last week. The Ordinance is directed towards granting internal political autonomy to the Northern Areas of Jammu and Kashmir. The Ordinance, however, falls short of local demands and is only a change in nomenclature rather than genuine political reforms. Â
The 1949 ceasefire line resulted in the division of J&K with Pakistan gaining control over some portion of the disputed territory. Pakistan administered region of J&K was subsequently divided in 1970 into two administrative zones: Azad Jammu and Kashmir (AJK) and Federally Administered Northern Regions. AJK is constitutionally not a part of Pakistan and is governed by an elected President, Prime Minister and Legislature. Northern Areas are under the direct control of Islamabad and is ruled through a Northern Area Council headed by Pakistan’s Minister for Kashmir Affairs. Click to continue…
Understanding J&K Dispute: People of Undivided J&K
The third level is the most vital, though widely ignored aspect of the J&K problem; the intra-regional relations within the undivided J&K territory. The socio-cultural and ethnic commonalities of the region override the political divisions enforced by drawing the LOC and creating untenable sub- divisions within each side. Strong forces of affinity and aversion exist within the various sub-regions of India administered J&K and Pakistan controlled AJK and Northern Areas making a simple conflict resolution approach unsustainable for the region. None of the five regions (Jammu, Kashmir, Ladakh, AJK, Northern Areas) of J&K have clearly defined mandate in terms of joining India or Pakistan or opting for complete independence. These intra-regional linkages further complicate any possibility of a consensual resolution. Click to continue…
Understanding J&K Dispute: Government of Pakistan and People of AJK and Norther Areas
The intra-national dimension of the J&K dispute also involves strained relations between the inhabitants of the Pakistan administered regions of J&K and the Federal Government of Pakistan. The 1949 ceasefire line resulted in the division of J&K with Pakistan gaining control over some portion of the disputed territory. Pakistan administered region of J&K was subsequently divided in 1970 into two administrative zones: Azad Jammu and Kashmir (AJK) and Federally Administered Northern Regions. AJK is constitutionally not a part of Pakistan and is governed by an elected President, Prime Minister and Legislature. Northern Areas are under the direct control of Islamabad and is ruled through a Northern Area Council headed by Pakistan’s Minister for Kashmir Affairs. Though Pakistan claims to be supporting the cause of self-determination in India administered regions of J&K, the degree of autonomy and kind of democratic freedoms granted to the populations of AJK and Northern Areas are highly controversial and have caused widespread unrest in the region. Click to continue…
Understanding the J&K Dispute: Government of India and People of J&K
At the second level J&K dispute refers to the relations between the Indian administered regions of J&K and the Government of India. The J&K territory east of the Line of Control (LOC) is formally a part of the Indian Union and west of the LOC is a part of Pakistan. Escaping popular attention and media limelight, the people of J&K have demanded redressal for their numerous grievances against the political leadership of the State and Government of India (GOI).
Â
Understanding the J&K Dispute : Inter-State Dimension
Jammu and Kashmir, referred to as one of the most dangerous places on earth, is embroiled in one of the most misunderstood conflicts of modern times. The general perception is that J&K as a territorial conflict is rooted in religious sentiments between India and Pakistan. This inter-state aspect highlights merely one dimension of the more complex intertwined dyads of a deeper conflict. This four part analysis of the J&K conflict elaborates on the primary dimensions of the conflict: i) inter-state aspect involving the states of India and Pakistan; ii) intra-national dimension involving grievances of the people in the India administered regions of J&K towards the Government of India and the lack of democratic freedoms in the Pakistan administered areas of Kashmir, and iii) inter-regional linkages among the various sub-regions of undivided J&K. Click to continue…
Omar Abdullah: “J&K elections have handed India a lifeline”
Â
Jammu and Kashmir’s new Chief Minister, Omar Abdullah said in an interview to Reuters today that the recent elections in J&K have handed India a lifeline; referring to an opportunity for the Government of India to refurbish relations with the people of J&K. The very premise of his contention is flawed and overlooks the basic cause of discontent in the state. Omar Abdullah’s assumption and rule (in line with his father Farooq Abdullah) is based on the understanding that discontent in J&K can be addressed if the government of India adopts a more emphatic view and caters to the socio-economic development of the state. His analysis skips over a vital intermediary link between the people of J&K and Government of India – the State Government. In the very first place Omar Abdullah’s government will have to win the confidence of the people of J&K and better comprehend their grievances. Click to continue…